The Difference Between Condemning Booing And Condemning The Right To Boo

England's national football team this weekend returned from their campaign in the Euros, having fallen in characteristic fashion to a penalty shoot-out. Unfortunately, the ugly streak of national team support which previously burnt an effigy of David Beckham for getting sent off in the 1998 World Cup reappared through racist abuse directed at the black players who missed England's penalties, and the defacing a mural of Marcus Rashford in Manchester. This prompted the UK Home Secretary, Priti Patel, to condemn the abuse, only for Tyrone Mings, an England player, to accuse her of having stoked such abuse through her prior position of criticising the players' kick-off stance of kneeling against racism, and her stated belief that it was the fans' right to decide whether to boo it themselves.

As cynical as Patel and this UK government in general are, in that specific instance she was correct that fans are as entitled to boo players making a statement as players were to make that statement in the first place. Irrespective of whether one agrees with the message or the medium in either direction, it should be self-evident that allowing one group of people (players, staff) to communicate their beliefs while denying that right to another group (fans) - particularly when, for the national team, those players are supposed to represent the nation as a whole - is wrong. If the right to boo should have been denied, and possibly punished, then those who cheered ought to have been subject to the same treatment. If the players had decided to stand behind a message that 'All Lives Matter', would the fans have been wrong to boo that as well?

BS With Friends Podcast: On Her Majesty's Secret Service

I was privileged to take part in a very enjoyable podcast about one of my favourite James Bond films, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, with resident hosts, Maxwell Roahrig and Xzyliac Ariel. We cover some recent entertainment news stories, Peter Hunt's borderline experimental editing, how Bond beat the Fast & Furious franchise to punch with a flying car (in addition to a double-taking pigeon), and On Her Majesty's gay influence, helped in part by writer Simon Raven, an old-school libertine who was expelled from school - and I quote said school's obituary - 'less for homosexuality than for the bravura with which he practiced it'.

 

Below the jump are links to articles I've written on this blog about Bond, including a set of film reviews and why OHMSS is the great unrecognised Christmas movie. Have fun!

The European Super League Could Save Football

Update: Chelsea and every other English club which had signed up to the Super League have now, thankfully and somewhat inevitably, rescinded their membership. Unfortunately, the Champions League reforms, which include their own anti-competitive protections for big clubs, have received little attention and are yet to be addressed. Nevertheless, in celebration of the Super League crumbling at least, I've added a few photos to the article from the protest I attended yesterday outside Chelsea's stadium.

For those who don't follow football - or soccer, if you're Stateside - the five biggest clubs in England, and Tottenham, plus the three biggest from Italy and Spain respectively, announced plans to break away from the major European club competition, the Champions League, in order to form their own, where they, the 'founding members', would be guaranteed participants. It is a cynical attempt to consolidate their power, increase and secure their already vast income streams, and mitigate the financial and symbolic risk of failing to qualify for the top table event in any given year. To put it bluntly, it is an entirely contemptible enterprise. It is so disgraceful that recent reforms to the existing Champions League, which themselves add measures to consolidate qualification for big clubs, have been largely ignored, despite being appalling in their own right.

That several European big clubs (putting aside the strangeness that half the founding clubs of an ostensibly European league are from a country which recently departed the European Union, but I digress) feel emboldened to do this speaks to how far football has strayed from its core purpose of being a working class sport driven by fans rather than corporate interests. In principle, I find it utterly reprehensible. However, I've argued before about how seemingly negative outcomes can produce unexpectedly constructive results, and how bad things can be an opportunity to change the status quo for the better. In that spirit, I'd like to present an alternate interpretation to the current consensus that the proposed Super League will mark the end of football, when it might present the opportunity to save it.

In Life And In Death, Prince Philip Embodied The Value Of The British Monarchy

The past few years have been turbulent for the British Royal Family. A slew of controversies, from the links between Prince Andrew and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, to the departure of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and their subsequent accusations of experiencing racism within the 'Firm', have led to increased questioning among the young in particular about what the monarchy is for and why it exists in an age of democracy and representation. The death of Prince Philip yesterday, the man who dutifully stood two paces behind the Queen for over seventy years and did more than anyone to make the monarchs visible and accessible to the public, will plausibly only galvanise such questions once the mourning period has faded.

Though many monarchists may recoil at the question being asked at all, it serves an important purpose not only in testing the resilience of the nation's institutions, but the clarity of people's understanding of their usefulness. The Royal Family is not elected or directly accountable to its people, nor should it be, but it cannot persist unless the people feel proud to be represented by them and that the values they embody are the right ones. In this, the allegations surrounding Prince Andrew's close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, and the Palace seemingly closing ranks to protect him, have been particularly corrosive. If the public is unsure why the monarchy remains important in spite of any controversies surrounding it, either the people in charge of maintaining our institutions, or the institutions themselves, are not doing their job. In this respect, while the death of Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, may be the first step in a period of transition for the monarchy, the remembrance of his remarkable life may also serve to remind the British people of its immense value to the nation and the world.

Uncertainty As The Path To Resurrection In Dante's Commedia

The Christian holidays have become largely divorced from their original meanings. In some ways this is helpful, allowing them to be days of universal celebration rather than exclusively serving a single section of our theologically diverse societies. Christmas is these days about giving, gratitude, and reuniting with loved ones, rather than specifically a celebration of Christ's birth. Christ's story encompasses those qualities, but what is celebrated are the shared values rather than the event itself. Though most are aware of Christmas' religious origins - it's right there in the name - the connection is not necessarily made between those origins and the values it now represents. This inevitably leads to the hackneyed complaint that Christmas is just about 'capitalism', which says more about the complainer's inability to understand the value of giving than they might have wished.

Easter is further divorced from the reasons for its Christian celebration than Christmas. In part, this is because the name does not tie in so obviously. According to the Venerable Bede, a seventh-century monk known as the 'Father of English history' for his ecumenical writings, the month of Christ's resurrection was called Eostremonath in Old English, named for the goddess Eostre. The association between the two stuck even after the name of the month changed. Aside from the loose symbolism of eggs to birth, the idea of resurrection has been lost in how we celebrate Easter today. In search of that original meaning and how it relates to our contemporary lives, we should look to one of the great works of the global literary canon, whose narrative not coincidentally begins on Maundy Thursday, just before Easter Weekend: Dante Alighieri's epic poem, the Commedia.

Movies: Zack Snyder's Justice League review

FILM REVIEW

Review Scoring Chart - 10: Masterpiece; 9: Outstanding; 8: Very Good; 7: Good; 6: Above Average; 5: Average; 4: Below Average; 3: Bad; 2: Awful; 1: Reprehensible; 0: Non-Functional.

ZACK SNYDER'S JUSTICE LEAGUE
Dir: Zack Snyder

Stars: Ben Affleck, Gal Gadot, Ray Fisher, Ezra Miller, Jason Momoa, Henry Cavill

Running Time: 242mins

Zack Snyder's cut of the 2017 Justice League movie sits at the nexus between the Donner cut of Superman II and Snyder's own extended edition of Justice League's much-derided predecessor, Batman v Superman. Although director's cuts of movies have existed for a long time, the 2006 re-edit of Superman II to fit the vision of original director, Richard Donner, was the first time a movie had been effectively remade and rewritten with unused footage and the removal of any scenes added by the director who took over the project. Ten years later, Zack Snyder used the home release of Batman v Superman to signficantly extend the running time and clarify the near-incoherent narrative of the theatrical cut.

Snyder's re-edit of Justice League does a little of both: it removes all trace of Joss Whedon's contribution to the 2017 release and uses its massively extended running time - doubled, in fact - to add missing character motivations and give the story room to breathe. Like his Batman v Superman extended cut, it improves on many of the fundamental shortcomings of the original release. However, just as the Donner cut simply turned a bad movie into a different kind of bad movie, Snyder's Justice League may be different from Whedon's cut, but whether it's a better movie overall is an open question.

Appreciating Nikki van der Zyl, Who Gave The Women Of James Bond Their Voice

For a series whose hero embodies the masculine id, the history of women's influence on the James Bond movies is a long and fascinating one. The figure of the Bond girl is the most famous and most analysed, though the importance of the many women who have guided the series from behind the screen is just as great, albeit less widely recognised. A prominent modern example would be Barbara Broccoli, the daughter of one of the series' original producers, Cubby Broccoli, and who now runs the show along with her half-brother, Michael G. Wilson. A less known example would be Johanna Harwood, an Irish screenwriter who was a credited screenwriter on the first two Bond movies, Dr. No and From Russia With Love, and contributed uncredited work to Goldfinger.

One of the least recognised names is Nikki van der Zyl, yet if you haven't heard of her, as a Bond fan you certainly will have heard her. A German voiceover artist who died three days ago aged 85, van der Zyl leaves behind a legacy which shaped the Bond girl icon every bit as much as Ursula Andress - whose voice van der Zyl dubbed.

The Datafication Of The Human Being

Datafication is a term invented in 2013 by Victor Mayer-Schoenberger and Kenneth Culkier to describe the process of digitally mapping human activity and interactions into data and how it is fed back into the real world by businesses and governments to optimise their services based on the information gathered. This manifests in ways both seemingly benign, such businesses and cities changing the allocation of their resources to suit the activities of their customers and citizens, and more concerning, such as employers and banks using an individual's data to determine their employability or assess an application for a loan.

This trend carries enormous implications for privacy and freedom, particularly when it comes to systems either being faulty, such as facial recognition systems used by law enforcement struggling to differentiate between black faces, or outright abused, as in China's use of mass surveillance to monitor and control every aspect of its citizens' lives. As enormous as these issues are, the focus of this piece is not on how datafication has changed how data presents us, but rather how we have allowed datafication to change the way we perceive ourselves.

Adam Curtis' Nostalgia For Radicalism Paints A Bleak Picture Of A World Changing For The Better

Adam Curtis released his latest documentary series, 'Can't Get You Out Of My Head', last week. All six episodes are currently available for UK viewers to watch on the BBC's iPlayer, while worldwide viewers can watch it here. As one might expect from Curtis, it is an expertly made visual collage with a superlative soundtrack, telling the stories of some fascinating figures largely forgotten to history, which Curtis ties together as part of his overall mission statement. This time, he is telling an 'emotional history' of how Western society embraced individualism to compensate for how the radicals of the past failed the change the world for the better, eventually leading to the rise of conspiracy theories and populism.

If that sounds familiar to Curtis' fans, it should: the documentary acts as something of a greatest hits of his previous concerns, ending up feeling almost as much of a retreat into Curtis' own history as that of the world. His signature phrases, '...And then something strange happened' and 'So they went back, into the passed' are trotted out in key moments much as how Marvel deploys beloved characters at unexpected moments for maximum fan excitement. It's as exciting, electric and eclectic as the best of his work to date. But then something strange happened: in going back, into his past, Curtis became infected with the very nostalgia-driven nihilism he attributed to others. In repeating his familiar refrains about our failures to improve the world, he missed how the world has been steadily improving in a different way to how he was expecting.

Games: Super Mario 3D World + Bowser's Fury (Nintendo Switch) review

GAME REVIEW

Review Scoring Chart - 10: Masterpiece; 9: Outstanding; 8: Very Good; 7: Good; 6: Above Average; 5: Average; 4: Below Average; 3: Bad; 2: Awful; 1: Reprehensible; 0: Non-Functional.

SUPER MARIO 3D WORLD + BOWSER'S FURY
Developer: Nintendo

Publisher: Nintendo 

Platform: Nintendo Switch

 

Nintendo's latest console, the Switch, is awash with games carried over from its previous one, the Wii U, which sold far less well. It's a strategy which has been a boon for Nintendo, padding out the Switch's library with games which never got the chance to sell as well as they might have, but less so for those of us who owned a Wii U in the first place, who have found original releases few and far between. In order to combat this, Nintendo has taken to adding extra material to the games in question. On the whole, this material has been half-hearted at best, with an extra character added to Donkey Kong: Tropical Freeze and a few token side-missions reusing environments in Pikmin 3.

The headline extra in the port of Super Mario 3D World is a mode entitled 'Bowser's Fury', a more substantive addition which, were it not for its short length - about two hours to see the credits, perhaps four to finish everything - could be called a new game in its own right, one possibly hinting at a more open-world, non-linear future for the Mario series than even Odyssey, the Switch's own original Mario title.